Which of the following is NOT a criterion for major burns according to policy 605?

The criterion for major burns is generally established to identify severe burn injuries that require specialized medical intervention. In the context of the provided choices, the correct answer indicates a misunderstanding of the criteria set forth in policy 605.

Partial thickness burns greater than 7% are indeed a significant factor in determining the severity of burns, as they indicate a considerable area of skin that has been damaged. This level of burn can lead to complications, such as infection and fluid loss, and typically necessitates advanced medical care.

Burns that affect major joints are also considered critical since they can impact mobility and function, complicating recovery and rehabilitation.

Third-degree burns, which involve the full thickness of the skin, are another clear criterion for major burns due to their severe nature and the need for extensive treatment, including possible skin grafting and long-term care.

Chemical burn injuries can also fall under serious criteria depending on their severity and the extent of the injury. The policy outlines certain specifics regarding these types of burns that distinguish them as major due to the complications they may present.

Thus, the answer is correct in stating that partial thickness burns greater than 7% is not excluded from the criteria for major burns in policy 605, as it is, in fact, a